European Union
EU ombudsman’s ruling in EU’s favor on EBGA online gambling complaint seems a small wonder
The European Union’s Ombudsman office has ruled against the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) with regard to a complaint that the group filed opposing EU, the previous year, over its deliberate dropping of cases involving cross-border (but within the EU) offering of online gambling services.
The EGBA filed its grievances against the EU back in December of 2016 in response to EU falling short of enforcing the EU’s cross-border codes referring the online-gambling services. The group cited several instances of the EU’s failure to intervene or force compliance by member countries. The group’s complaint leaned heavily on the notorious Article 56 of the TFEU, along with other regulations.
However, the EGBA’s complaint also ran into last year’s decision by the European Union to halt the attempts to enforce Article 56 in the face of defiant opposition from a majority of EU member states. Those countries have persistently sought to block cross-border services, often in the interest of protecting state-run lottery, casino, and other gambling operations.
It was a small wonder that whatsoever the EU would dismiss, the EGBA’s claim.
Here is the Ombudsman’s Office’s complete statement on the dismissal:
The European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) which represents online gaming and betting operators in the European Union, made a number of infringement complaints to the European Commission arguing that the regulatory framework for online gambling in certain Member States was not in line with EU law.
As EGBA was concerned that the Commission did not follow up on these complaints, and did not engage in an open dialogue with stakeholders, it turned to the European Ombudsman.
The Ombudsman inquired into the case. In the course of the inquiry, the Commission decided to close all the infringement complaints. The Ombudsman noted that the Commission has wide discretion on whether and how to pursue infringement cases and that the decision taken fell within the boundaries of that discretion. The Ombudsman inspected the Commission’s files concerning the several Member States in order to evaluate the Commission’s procedural handling of the infringement complaints in the light of the relevant rules and principles. On the basis of the inspection, she found that the Commission had not committed maladministration. Therefore, the Ombudsman closed the case.
“Wide discretion,” as interpreted by the EU, continues to mean, “We don’t want to enforce our own rules.” The problem is that the EU’s failure to enforce its own rules in a crux issue of online trade (online gambling) represents the top of a slippery slope; it’s not at all an absurd extension to see such EU inaction extended to other forms of online trade, and even into certain forms of land-based commerce. (You’ll read about such an example in a follow-up story originating in Hungary.)
Ever since France and Italy first won EU approval to firewall their countries’ online-gambling services, the entirety of the EU has been involved in a slow race to the bottom. It’s going to take a long time to pay out, but one of the likeliest scenarios is that every single European state will end up with its own protected set of services and operators. That’s going to play hell with Euro-based online poker for a few years, somewhere down the road, until an even later date when some form of complex, pan-European liquidity sharing pool can be created.
That, though, isn’t the present. For now, it’s a giant “Tough titties” from the EU regarding online-gambling restrictions and prohibitions that really should be covered by EU oversight.
According to Maarten Haijer, the Secretary-General of EGBA, “Infringements proceedings in this sector have become a complete mess since the Commission decided to wash its hands of its responsibility to ensure online gambling regulation in the Member States is in line with EU law. While the Ombudsman’s decision is disappointing, it does confirm that the Commission’s decision to close these infringement cases was a political one. If the Commission is not taking seriously its responsibility to uphold EU law and ensure Member States, like Hungary, comply with EU Court of Justice rulings, then who will?”
Source: flushdraw.net(BY
Compliance Updates
THE EU AI ACT AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE IGAMING INDUSTRY
By: Danil Emelyanov, Head of AI Labs, Betby
First of all, the regulation of AI is inevitable. The EU was the first to step into this arena with the EU AI Act, setting a precedent that other parts of the world will likely follow. This proactive approach positions the EU as a leader in AI governance, but it also means that regions adopting similar regulations later might benefit from the lessons learned and adjustments made in response to early implementations.
The downside is that those who come last to the regulatory scene might indeed benefit the most. For instance, the competitive landscape in AI innovation currently favors new entrants in the US or UK over Europe, partly due to the stringent compliance requirements of the EU AI Act. This regulation could potentially affect the flow of investments into European AI ventures, making regions with more flexible or yet-to-be-defined regulations more attractive for AI start-ups and investors.
However, the positive aspect is the collaborative approach the EU has taken in drafting this legislation. It’s not a one-way mandate from legislators to businesses; rather, it involves dialogue and input from various stakeholders, including tech companies and open-source communities. Notably, there are exemptions for open-source AI models, likely influenced by contributions from French and German tech firms like Mistral and Aleph Alpha, which have been vocal about the importance of open-source innovation.
The AI Act predominantly focuses on regulating foundation models rather than classic machine learning models. The legislation sets a computational power threshold at 10^25 floating-point operations per second (FLOPS), below which AI systems are generally exempt from stringent regulations. This threshold implies that unless an organization is training a model on the scale of GPT-3.5 or larger, compliance concerns are minimal. This serves as a reminder of the value of simpler machine learning techniques like logistic regression and random forests, which can effectively solve business problems without the complexity and regulatory scrutiny of more advanced models.
For the iGaming industry, the implications of the EU AI Act are relatively manageable. Our legal teams will diligently study the law to ensure compliance, even if it means a slight reduction in the accuracy of our models. This cautious approach is necessary because the fines for non-compliance are substantial, ranging from 1.5% to 7% of global turnover, depending on the severity of the offense and the size of the company. Additionally, some aspects of the Act are vaguely defined, which could pose challenges in interpretation and application.
Despite these challenges, the iGaming sector should remain vigilant. Staying informed about regulatory updates and actively engaging with the regulatory process can help mitigate risks and ensure smooth compliance. The EU AI Act sets high standards for transparency, accountability, and ethical AI use, which, whilst demanding, also push the industry towards more responsible AI deployment.
Compliance Updates
EGBA Welcomes European Parliament’s Approval Of New EU Anti-Money Laundering Framework
The EU’s new anti-money laundering package aims to create a more consistent regulatory framework and will benefit online gambling operators by standardising AML rules and reporting requirements across member states.
Brussels, 24 April 2024 – The European Parliament has approved the EU’s new anti-money laundering (AML) package at its plenary sitting today, marking a significant milestone towards a new EU framework for combatting financial crime. The European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA), representing Europe’s leading online gambling operators, welcomes the Parliament’s approval of the new AML package and believes the incoming rule changes will strengthen the EU’s approach to tackling money laundering.
The new package will contain:
- A single rulebook regulation – with provisions on conducting due diligence on customers, transparency of beneficial owners and the use of crypto-assets.
- The 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive – containing national provisions on supervision and national AML authorities, as well as on the access of authorities to necessary and reliable information, e.g. beneficial ownership registers.
- The establishment of the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA) – which have supervisory and investigative powers to ensure compliance with AML requirements, operating in conjunction with national AML authorities.
EGBA believes the new rules will benefit Europe’s online gambling operators by ensuring a consistent regulatory approach across EU member states. Another important feature, under the competence of AMLA, will be the creation of a harmonised reporting format for Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs). This will ensure that Europe’s online gambling operators encounter the same STR requirements across all EU member states, thereby setting clear and consistent expectations that will reduce administrative burdens and costs.
To assist online gambling operators in complying with the EU’s new AML rules, EGBA has developed industry-specific guidelines on anti-money laundering which apply a risk-based approach and include practical measures that operators can take – on customer and business risk assessments, customer due diligence processes, suspicious transaction reporting, and record keeping. EGBA members already apply the guidelines and submit annual reports to EGBA that summarise their progress in implementing its measures. The guidelines are also open to all operators based in the EU and EGBA encourages operators to sign up to them.
The AML package now awaits formal adoption by the Council of the EU, expected in May, before being published in the EU’s Official Journal.
“We welcome the European Parliament’s approval of the new anti-money laundering package. The new framework will set high standards and ensure greater consistency in the application of AML rules across the EU. Online gambling operators, especially those operating in multiple countries, will benefit from a single rulebook and harmonised reporting requirements that will unravel national complexities. We will look to review our industry guidelines on AML to ensure their alignment with the new EU rules. By signing up to the guidelines, operators can already prepare themselves for the incoming changes in the EU rules and join our members in their efforts to proactively and positively contribute to the EU’s fight against money laundering.” – Dr. Ekaterina Hartmann, Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs, EGBA.
Source: EGBA
Compliance Updates
European Union Updates Country List for Stricter AML Checks
The European Commission, the executive branch of the European Union (EU), has updated its list of high-risk countries, from which players should be subjected to stricter customer checks by gambling operators.
Based on Directive (EU) 2015/849, Article 9, the Commission identifies any high-risk third countries that have strategic deficiencies in their regime on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism.
As such, operators based in the EU that are offering services to these countries or dealing with players from these nations are obliged to carry out heightened vigilance checks.
The list was first published in July 2016 and has been updated a number of times as further countries of concern are identified and flagged by the Commission.
The latest countries to be added to this list – in an update published last month – include Burkina Faso, the Cayman Islands, Haiti, Jordan, Malo, Morocco, Myanmar, the Philippines, Senegal and South Sudan.
Other nations included on the list include Afghanistan, Barbados, Cambodia, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Iran, Jamaica, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Syria, Trinidad and Tobago, Uganda, Vanuatu, Yemen and Zimbabwe.
-
Latest News2 days ago
Make every pixel personal: Opera GX facelift lets you match your browser to your setup down to the smallest detail
-
Latest News2 days ago
Casino Management System Market to Reach USD 29.09 Billion by 2032 | Enhanced Security and Operational Efficiency Drive Growth | Research by S&S Insider
-
Latest News2 days ago
Fast Track Celebrates Third Year as a Great Place to Work Certified™ Tech Company
-
Latest News7 days ago
Exploring the Strategic Benefits of Cashback Programs with Bojoko CEO Joonas Karhu
-
Africa4 days ago
South Africa: Tribunal Grants Lottoland Interim Relief – Orders Google to Grant Lottoland Access to its Advertising Platform
-
Financial reports7 days ago
SharpLink Gaming Announces Third Quarter 2024 Financial Results
-
Latest News2 days ago
ACR POKER ADDS BLITZ BONUS BOOST TO NOVEMBER CALENDAR AS $20 MILLION GTD WINTER OSS ENTERS FINAL DAYS
-
Latest News2 days ago
IBIA Upgrades Technology Platform to Strengthen Global Betting Integrity Efforts